The Daily Barometer (Oregon State University student newspaper) recently ran a story about a student club that aims to deliver real world experience in the area of portfolio management and stock analysis. The OSU Foundation lets the club manage ~$1.4MM of real money, so it’s more than just a theoretical exercise. It sounds like a pretty good program and the members appear to be earnest and passionate about participating. One part of the article in particular caught my eye: Continue reading
Category Archives: investment theory
Your Pre-Election Investment Plan
Questions about how the election will influence markets are probably the most common inquiries advisors have been fielding over the last couple of months. It’s the same for every big election. The answer is pretty easy. Continue reading
Investment Lessons From Shallow Hal
In the movie Shallow Hal, the protagonist (Hal) has a hard time finding love due to his ridiculously superficial views toward women. A chance meeting with self-help guru Tony Robbins illustrates the depth of his problem: Continue reading
Three Ways To Ruin Your Edge
In The Pruning Effect we looked at actual results generated by a strategy designed to deliver a lopsided relationship between the size of gains relative to the size of losses. This asymmetry of returns results in a statistical advantage over time which is the key in separating investing from gambling.
Possession of a statistical edge is a vitally important factor in sustaining performance over an investing life that can span many decades. Luck can help you out here and there, but luck is unreliable. A good plan is one with rules that can be measured and replicated. A good plan is a prerequisite for long term results but it is just that – a prerequisite. People with good plans fail all the time, not because of their plan, but because they are people that suffer from human nature. Here are three ways we traditionally blow our edge and sabotage a perfectly good plan: Continue reading
The Pruning Effect
I’ve talked and written at length about the necessity of recognizing that we are imperfect and how our natural tendency to fight that reality harms us as investors. When we deny that a loss is really a loss (see The Paper Loss Fallacy) we allow the problem to potentially grow into something meaningful and dangerous. By becoming comfortable with the reality of imperfection we give ourselves the opportunity to keep losses small while letting winners grow unconstrained. Rules that allow for the generation of a lopsided relationship between the size of wins and losses are the key to generating long term growth.
Recently I conducted a review of a client account that has been here since January 2008. Every transaction was examined Continue reading